PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
17.83%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
-1.12%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-167.19%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-167.19%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
392.94%
Growth of 392.94% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-16.76%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-27.36%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.64%
Purchases growth of 34.64% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1759.09%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-9.40%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.89%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
46.83%
Buyback growth of 46.83% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.