PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.98%
Net income growth of 22.98% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
-4.60%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-62.95%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
133.73%
SBC growth of 133.73% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
98.38%
Working capital of 98.38% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
779.62%
AR growth of 779.62% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.15%
Growth of 2.15% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-110.50%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
23.77%
CFO growth of 23.77% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
44.83%
CapEx growth of 44.83% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-6.33%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
-134.84%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
129.99%
Proceeds growth of 129.99% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-70.34%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
72.80%
Investing flow of 72.80% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
120.17%
Issuance growth of 120.17% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
-92.99%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.