503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.75%
Net income growth of 9.75% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
10.57%
D&A growth of 10.57% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-9.52%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
8.11%
SBC growth of 8.11% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-222.37%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-192.16%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
132.38%
Growth of 132.38% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
169.79%
Growth of 169.79% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-22.30%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-36.27%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
91.98%
Acquisition growth of 91.98% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-5.34%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-24.17%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-492.86%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
53.52%
Investing flow of 53.52% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
261.46%
Issuance growth of 261.46% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
-38.46%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.