PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-6.78%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
10.60%
D&A growth of 10.60% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-68.11%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
3.61%
SBC growth of 3.61% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
182.16%
Working capital of 182.16% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
171.81%
AR growth of 171.81% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.43%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-119.24%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
55.07%
CFO growth of 55.07% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-9.21%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
68.13%
Acquisition growth of 68.13% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
44.89%
Purchases growth of 44.89% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-54.07%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
140.13%
Growth of 140.13% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
25.83%
Investing flow of 25.83% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.52%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
69.44%
Buyback growth of 69.44% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.