PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
86.40%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 16.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
-4.80%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
1295.65%
Deferred tax growth of 1295.65% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
9.48%
SBC growth of 9.48% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-183.70%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-201.49%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
179.26%
Growth of 179.26% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-754.77%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-18.63%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
13.56%
CapEx growth of 13.56% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-61.54%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
59.13%
Purchases growth of 59.13% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-46.16%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
92.33%
Investing flow of 92.33% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-27.34%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
-61.29%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-151.10%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.