503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
12.78%
Net income growth of 12.78% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
3.46%
D&A growth under 50% of Technology median of 0.43%, or significantly exceeding it. Jim Chanos would suspect overcapacity or misallocated capex if new assets do not pay off quickly.
-100.41%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
0.21%
SBC growth of 0.21% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
850.02%
Working capital of 850.02% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-312.84%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3376.90%
Growth of 3376.90% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-6730.77%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-24.20%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 11.59%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-85.78%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
271.33%
Acquisition growth of 271.33% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
62.79%
Purchases growth of 62.79% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-60.52%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.23%
Investing flow of 30.23% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
24.56%
Debt repayment growth of 24.56% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-436.97%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-89.77%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.