PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
19.74%
Net income growth of 19.74% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
-3.34%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
69.36%
Deferred tax growth of 69.36% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
9.54%
SBC growth of 9.54% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-89.91%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
188.66%
AR growth of 188.66% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
16.13%
Inventory growth of 16.13% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-13233.33%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-100.26%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
96.19%
Growth of 96.19% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
46.22%
Positive CFO growth while Technology median is negative at -1.33%. Peter Lynch would see a notable cash advantage in a challenging sector environment.
25.59%
CapEx growth of 25.59% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-396.73%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
-77.70%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
30.63%
Proceeds growth of 30.63% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
148.40%
Growth of 148.40% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-20.34%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-26.79%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
112.45%
Issuance growth of 112.45% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
-14.59%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.