PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.62%
Net income growth of 22.62% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
-4.47%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
20.95%
Deferred tax growth of 20.95% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
4.73%
SBC growth of 4.73% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-204.59%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-189.00%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
181.20%
Inventory growth of 181.20% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
154.00%
AP growth of 154.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-117.28%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
31.33%
Growth of 31.33% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-48.91%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
12.94%
CapEx growth of 12.94% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
90.51%
Acquisition growth of 90.51% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
20.51%
Purchases growth of 20.51% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
61.57%
Proceeds growth of 61.57% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-38.51%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
68.33%
Investing flow of 68.33% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-22.85%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
272.88%
Issuance growth of 272.88% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
-14.84%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.