PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-21.13%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
8.60%
D&A growth of 8.60% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
49.57%
Deferred tax growth of 49.57% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-2.17%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
197.37%
Working capital of 197.37% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
192.69%
AR growth of 192.69% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-144.74%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-123.61%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
80.11%
Growth of 80.11% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
22.96%
Growth of 22.96% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
107.17%
CFO growth of 107.17% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-34.01%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-107.25%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
-144.13%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
64.22%
Proceeds growth of 64.22% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-92.84%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-354.71%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
81.40%
Debt repayment growth of 81.40% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
112.88%
Issuance growth of 112.88% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
83.21%
Buyback growth of 83.21% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.