PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.05%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 5.48%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
4.36%
D&A growth of 4.36% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
61.43%
Deferred tax growth of 61.43% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-0.66%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
88.04%
Working capital of 88.04% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
148.82%
AR growth of 148.82% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-1363.64%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-109.78%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
7.23%
Growth of 7.23% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-11.34%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
102.22%
CFO growth of 102.22% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.27%
Acquisition growth of 65.27% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-80.27%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
20.63%
Proceeds growth of 20.63% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
238.17%
Growth of 238.17% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-195.41%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
40.00%
Issuance growth of 40.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
38.00%
Buyback growth of 38.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.