PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.62%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative at -10.03%. Peter Lynch would view it as a strong advantage vs. struggling peers.
-2.95%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
195.51%
Deferred tax growth of 195.51% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
5.66%
SBC growth of 5.66% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-0.07%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
216.78%
AR growth of 216.78% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-456.68%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-156.79%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-67.74%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
10.90%
Growth of 10.90% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
39.00%
CFO growth of 39.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
31.38%
CapEx growth of 31.38% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
25.00%
Acquisition growth of 25.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
45.35%
Purchases growth of 45.35% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-49.98%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-179.01%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
20.98%
Investing flow of 20.98% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
25.71%
Debt repayment growth of 25.71% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
22.29%
Issuance growth of 22.29% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
-109.98%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.