PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
25.06%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
32.18%
D&A growth of 32.18% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-143.56%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-6.93%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-37.44%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-173.67%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
254.27%
Inventory growth of 254.27% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
318.12%
AP growth of 318.12% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
96.22%
Growth of 96.22% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-7.78%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-46.22%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-40.70%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-826.67%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
11.12%
Purchases growth of 11.12% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
20.42%
Proceeds growth of 20.42% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
360.94%
Growth of 360.94% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
77.79%
Investing flow of 77.79% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
41.20%
Debt repayment growth of 41.20% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-42.36%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
3.43%
Buyback growth of 3.43% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.