PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-13.69%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 6.59%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-0.48%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-7.95%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
1.86%
SBC growth of 1.86% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
92.76%
Working capital of 92.76% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
151.30%
AR growth of 151.30% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-131.49%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-218.94%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
15.42%
Growth of 15.42% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
3.32%
Growth of 3.32% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
128.85%
CFO growth of 128.85% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
31.18%
CapEx growth of 31.18% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-12.95%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
-62.45%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
32.86%
Proceeds growth of 32.86% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-72.46%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-317.95%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
48.98%
Debt repayment growth of 48.98% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
20.51%
Issuance growth of 20.51% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
12.68%
Buyback growth of 12.68% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.