PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.56%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is -4.56%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-18.03%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
181.57%
Deferred tax growth of 181.57% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
4.53%
SBC growth of 4.53% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-13.53%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
223.57%
AR growth of 223.57% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-142.71%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-176.36%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-63.29%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
4.21%
Growth of 4.21% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-12.19%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
3.61%
CapEx growth of 3.61% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
97.49%
Acquisition growth of 97.49% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-2.61%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-16.63%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-55.51%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
13.16%
Investing flow of 13.16% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
25.00%
Debt repayment growth of 25.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
47.95%
Issuance growth of 47.95% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
-146.84%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.