PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-14.98%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-0.39%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-19.43%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
1.26%
SBC growth of 1.26% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
74.83%
Working capital of 74.83% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
208.20%
AR growth of 208.20% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-140.19%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-384.67%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
7.70%
Growth of 7.70% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
3.43%
Under 50% of Technology median of 5.42% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
120.51%
CFO growth of 120.51% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
6.64%
CapEx growth of 6.64% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
94.20%
Acquisition growth of 94.20% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-57.66%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
43.94%
Proceeds growth of 43.94% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-240.34%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-16.22%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-37.04%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
20.66%
Issuance growth of 20.66% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
-139.21%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.