PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
244.60%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative at -12.29%. Peter Lynch would view it as a strong advantage vs. struggling peers.
-2.14%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
111.34%
Deferred tax growth of 111.34% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
3.06%
SBC growth of 3.06% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
3.28%
Working capital of 3.28% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
217.03%
AR growth of 217.03% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-118.41%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
4.93%
AP growth of 4.93% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-57.68%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-163.86%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
26.09%
CFO growth of 26.09% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
23.86%
CapEx growth of 23.86% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
37.70%
Acquisition growth of 37.70% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-48.74%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
51.26%
Proceeds growth of 51.26% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
2166.67%
Growth of 2166.67% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
0.02%
Investing flow of 0.02% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
46.30%
Debt repayment growth of 46.30% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
45.03%
Issuance growth of 45.03% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
-11.17%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.