PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-16.88%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
11.89%
D&A growth of 11.89% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-278.06%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-1.19%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
1.12%
Working capital of 1.12% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-365.56%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-20.33%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
86.82%
AP growth of 86.82% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
62.24%
Growth of 62.24% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-5.50%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-18.36%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-15.03%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
88.73%
Acquisition growth of 88.73% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-10.08%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-7.95%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-18.18%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-83.71%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
97.22%
Debt repayment growth of 97.22% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
8.81%
Issuance growth of 8.81% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
4.67%
Buyback growth of 4.67% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.