PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
10.87%
Net income growth of 10.87% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
19.27%
D&A growth of 19.27% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-4013.33%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
9.10%
SBC growth of 9.10% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-25.63%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-137.79%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
230.57%
Inventory growth of 230.57% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
122.35%
AP growth of 122.35% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
24.39%
Growth of 24.39% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-8.19%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-45.51%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
8.09%
CapEx growth of 8.09% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-103066.67%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
18.20%
Purchases growth of 18.20% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
40.80%
Proceeds growth of 40.80% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
1373.81%
Growth of 1373.81% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
20.14%
Investing flow of 20.14% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-1730.22%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
-45.64%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
17.49%
Buyback growth of 17.49% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.