PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-7.67%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 4.86%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
13.25%
D&A growth of 13.25% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-32.37%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
15.12%
SBC growth of 15.12% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
44.37%
Working capital of 44.37% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
154.85%
AR growth of 154.85% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-101.41%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-529.29%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
22.45%
Growth of 22.45% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-8.63%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
69.39%
CFO growth of 69.39% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
14.74%
CapEx growth of 14.74% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
96.76%
Acquisition growth of 96.76% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
6.11%
Purchases growth of 6.11% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-28.42%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-200.93%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
58.03%
Investing flow of 58.03% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
94.88%
Debt repayment growth of 94.88% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
36.64%
Issuance growth of 36.64% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
42.71%
Buyback growth of 42.71% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.