PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.09%
Net income growth of 9.09% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
7.81%
D&A growth of 7.81% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
85.08%
Deferred tax growth of 85.08% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
6.18%
SBC growth of 6.18% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-298.63%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-141.66%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
242.42%
Inventory growth of 242.42% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
98.72%
AP growth of 98.72% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
79.10%
Growth of 79.10% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-1945.45%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-22.71%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-4.73%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
82.68%
Acquisition growth of 82.68% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
18.72%
Purchases growth of 18.72% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-34.80%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-216.42%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-239.86%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
99.28%
Debt repayment growth of 99.28% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-45.20%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-5.99%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.