PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.19%
Net income growth of 4.19% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
12.38%
D&A growth of 12.38% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-125.40%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
0.82%
SBC growth of 0.82% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
68.49%
Working capital of 68.49% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-1149.94%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-238.67%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
454.21%
AP growth of 454.21% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
13958.21%
Growth of 13958.21% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-251.92%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
6.68%
CFO growth of 6.68% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-25.94%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-401.52%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
-18.66%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
9.95%
Proceeds growth of 9.95% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-129.93%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-8849.02%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-0.58%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
17.96%
Buyback growth of 17.96% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.