PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.02%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative at -1.06%. Peter Lynch would view it as a strong advantage vs. struggling peers.
-24.51%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
92.25%
Deferred tax growth of 92.25% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
7.93%
SBC growth of 7.93% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-47.87%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
194.53%
AR growth of 194.53% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-221.91%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-89.59%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-172.94%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-62.03%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is -1.72%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
3.55%
CFO growth of 3.55% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-3.44%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
70.85%
Acquisition growth of 70.85% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
22.77%
Purchases growth of 22.77% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-24.36%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-67.85%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-20.37%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.29%
Issuance growth of 60.29% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
-16.44%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.