PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.30%
Net income growth of 11.30% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
4.39%
D&A growth of 4.39% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-54.55%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
7.55%
SBC growth of 7.55% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-566.42%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-145.32%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
197.52%
Inventory growth of 197.52% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-89.52%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
45.91%
Growth of 45.91% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-176.56%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-35.27%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
14.94%
CapEx growth of 14.94% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
13.72%
Acquisition growth of 13.72% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-3.51%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
6.03%
Proceeds growth of 6.03% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
115.70%
Growth of 115.70% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
68.93%
Investing flow of 68.93% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.59%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
3.08%
Buyback growth of 3.08% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.