PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.04%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 2.20%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
6.34%
D&A growth of 6.34% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-417.65%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-2.62%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
139.11%
Working capital of 139.11% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
107.24%
AR growth of 107.24% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-141.75%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
2424.24%
AP growth of 2424.24% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
151.29%
Growth of 151.29% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
0.85%
Growth of 0.85% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
77.21%
CFO growth of 77.21% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-21.92%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-1710.12%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
-21.75%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
18.13%
Proceeds growth of 18.13% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
22.32%
Growth of 22.32% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-480.23%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
84.62%
Debt repayment growth of 84.62% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
31.13%
Issuance growth of 31.13% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
-6.04%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.