PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.87%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative at -0.27%. Peter Lynch would view it as a strong advantage vs. struggling peers.
-29.88%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is -0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-520.85%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
9.76%
SBC growth of 9.76% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
27.16%
Working capital of 27.16% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
192.84%
AR growth of 192.84% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-17.79%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-158.93%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-125.20%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-139.22%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is -11.25%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-5.81%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is -6.73%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
8.56%
CapEx growth of 8.56% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
72.37%
Acquisition growth of 72.37% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-1.91%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
110.06%
Proceeds growth of 110.06% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
24.43%
Growth of 24.43% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
67.81%
Investing flow of 67.81% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.73%
Issuance growth of 24.73% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
36.36%
Buyback growth of 36.36% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.