PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.74%
Net income growth of 9.74% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
9.16%
D&A growth of 9.16% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-12.72%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-1.99%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
130.22%
Working capital of 130.22% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-698.58%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
252.83%
Inventory growth of 252.83% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
422.11%
AP growth of 422.11% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
288.57%
Growth of 288.57% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
210.00%
Growth of 210.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
17.71%
CFO growth of 17.71% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-35.36%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-13.29%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
-32.14%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-13.88%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
84.05%
Growth of 84.05% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-179.84%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.48%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-3.54%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.