PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.27%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 2.51%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-7.53%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
19.19%
Deferred tax growth of 19.19% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
9.07%
SBC growth of 9.07% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-1449.42%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-142.59%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is -17.05%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
290.62%
Inventory growth of 290.62% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
204.59%
AP growth of 204.59% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
39.10%
Growth of 39.10% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
880.80%
A moderate rise while Technology median is negative at -24.18%. Peter Lynch might see peers cleaning up intangible or one-time items more aggressively.
-34.78%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is -8.17%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-5.90%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
24.01%
Acquisition growth of 24.01% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-26.54%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
25.80%
Proceeds growth of 25.80% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
98.25%
Growth of 98.25% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
7.16%
Investing flow of 7.16% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-63.74%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-21.40%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.