PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-14.98%
Negative net income growth indicates shrinking profitability. Benjamin Graham would label it a concern unless explained by temporary factors.
-0.39%
Negative yoy D&A growth lowers the drag on net earnings. Benjamin Graham would confirm if it is due to fully depreciated assets or a slower expansion cycle.
-19.43%
A negative yoy change in deferred tax might cut future liabilities. Benjamin Graham would verify whether real tax payments are simply being recognized sooner.
1.26%
SBC up to 10% yoy – Acceptable. Seth Klarman would expect net income to grow enough to offset the mild dilution.
74.83%
Working capital above 30% yoy – Very high. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on whether the buildup is strategic or signals inefficiency.
208.20%
Receivables above 15% yoy – Alarm for possible major collection issues. Philip Fisher would investigate if revenue recognition is artificially boosted.
-140.19%
Negative inventory growth can release cash if sales remain solid. Benjamin Graham would confirm no slump in revenue driving the decline.
-384.67%
A negative yoy AP change means the firm is paying down supplier credit. Benjamin Graham would see it as lowering short-term liabilities if revenue is stable.
7.70%
Up to 10% yoy – Manageable. Seth Klarman would see no major volatility unless overshadowed by revenue shifts.
3.43%
Up to 10% yoy – Typically manageable. Seth Klarman would accept mild fluctuations in non-cash lines if fundamentals remain intact.
120.51%
Operating cash flow growth above 20% – Exceptional. Warren Buffett would ensure it stems from sustainable operations, not just working capital shifts.
6.64%
CapEx 5-10% yoy – Noticeable. Peter Lynch would see if revenue growth or competitive advantages justify the extra outlay.
94.20%
Acquisition spending above 15% yoy – Aggressive M&A approach. Philip Fisher would demand evidence the acquisitions truly enhance shareholder value.
-57.66%
A negative yoy shift can boost short-term liquidity if no prime investments appear. Benjamin Graham would consider it wise if safer returns do not exist.
43.94%
Proceeds growth above 30% yoy – Significant inflow. Warren Buffett would verify if it is opportunistic liquidation or a sign of pulling out from less profitable ventures.
-240.34%
A negative yoy shift can free up liquidity if expansions or intangible items are cut back. Benjamin Graham would see it as beneficial for near-term returns unless it hampers growth.
-16.22%
A negative yoy shift suggests smaller outflows or net inflows if disposals exceed invests. Benjamin Graham would see a short-term FCF benefit unless growth is compromised.
-37.04%
A negative yoy figure indicates less repayment or possibly new debt issuance. Benjamin Graham would see rising leverage as a red flag unless expansions have strong returns.
20.66%
Issuance above 15% yoy – Significant equity raise. Philip Fisher would require a very compelling reason to risk heavy shareholder dilution.
-139.21%
A negative yoy indicates fewer share repurchases than last year or none. Benjamin Graham would see potential missed per-share gains if the stock is undervalued.