PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-24.85%
Negative net income growth indicates shrinking profitability. Benjamin Graham would label it a concern unless explained by temporary factors.
10.56%
D&A 10-15% yoy – Potential drag on reported income. Howard Marks would question if ROI on assets justifies it.
242.11%
Deferred taxes above 30% yoy – Significant surge. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on what drives this big potential future tax burden.
2.13%
SBC up to 10% yoy – Acceptable. Seth Klarman would expect net income to grow enough to offset the mild dilution.
51.99%
Working capital above 30% yoy – Very high. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on whether the buildup is strategic or signals inefficiency.
173.38%
Receivables above 15% yoy – Alarm for possible major collection issues. Philip Fisher would investigate if revenue recognition is artificially boosted.
-78.17%
Negative inventory growth can release cash if sales remain solid. Benjamin Graham would confirm no slump in revenue driving the decline.
-134.96%
A negative yoy AP change means the firm is paying down supplier credit. Benjamin Graham would see it as lowering short-term liabilities if revenue is stable.
11.79%
10-20% yoy – Noticeable. Peter Lynch would check if expansions or new divisions explain the bigger outflow.
-2.07%
A negative yoy shift in other non-cash items can lower reported volatility. Benjamin Graham would confirm it is not concealing real operational costs or artificially inflating net income.
85.19%
Operating cash flow growth above 20% – Exceptional. Warren Buffett would ensure it stems from sustainable operations, not just working capital shifts.
-14.03%
A negative yoy CapEx shift boosts near-term FCF if capacity is adequate. Benjamin Graham would see it as beneficial unless future growth is sacrificed.
-46.72%
A negative yoy shift indicates smaller M&A outflows or even net proceeds from divestitures. Benjamin Graham would see it as beneficial unless growth is stalled.
21.32%
Above 20% yoy – Large jump. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on the risk/return of tying up major liquidity in investments.
-26.09%
A negative yoy figure indicates fewer or no liquidations compared to last year. Benjamin Graham would check if holding long-term investments is wise or missing near-term cash opportunities.
-123.16%
A negative yoy shift can free up liquidity if expansions or intangible items are cut back. Benjamin Graham would see it as beneficial for near-term returns unless it hampers growth.
-64.75%
A negative yoy shift suggests smaller outflows or net inflows if disposals exceed invests. Benjamin Graham would see a short-term FCF benefit unless growth is compromised.
-643.80%
A negative yoy figure indicates less repayment or possibly new debt issuance. Benjamin Graham would see rising leverage as a red flag unless expansions have strong returns.
35.90%
Issuance above 15% yoy – Significant equity raise. Philip Fisher would require a very compelling reason to risk heavy shareholder dilution.
-4.87%
A negative yoy indicates fewer share repurchases than last year or none. Benjamin Graham would see potential missed per-share gains if the stock is undervalued.