PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.30%
Net income growth 10-15% – Solid. Seth Klarman would see it as healthy if margins also remain stable.
4.39%
D&A up to 5% yoy – Manageable. Seth Klarman would see normal expansions if revenue justifies the extra depreciation.
-54.55%
A negative yoy change in deferred tax might cut future liabilities. Benjamin Graham would verify whether real tax payments are simply being recognized sooner.
7.55%
SBC up to 10% yoy – Acceptable. Seth Klarman would expect net income to grow enough to offset the mild dilution.
-566.42%
A negative yoy change in working capital can free up cash. Benjamin Graham would confirm it is not from falling demand or asset disposal.
-145.32%
Negative receivables growth can be beneficial for cash flow if revenue remains stable. Benjamin Graham would confirm it is not from collapsing sales.
197.52%
Inventory above 15% yoy – Large spike. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on whether sales growth can absorb the extra stock.
-89.52%
A negative yoy AP change means the firm is paying down supplier credit. Benjamin Graham would see it as lowering short-term liabilities if revenue is stable.
45.91%
Above 30% yoy – Major jump. Philip Fisher would demand details on these miscellaneous lines to ensure transparency.
-176.56%
A negative yoy shift in other non-cash items can lower reported volatility. Benjamin Graham would confirm it is not concealing real operational costs or artificially inflating net income.
-35.27%
Negative yoy CFO growth indicates a decline in core cash generation. Benjamin Graham would treat it as a serious warning unless cyclical factors explain it.
14.94%
CapEx 10-15% yoy – Could pressure free cash flow. Howard Marks would expect robust returns on these investments.
13.72%
Acquisition spending 10-15% yoy – Could strain cash unless synergies are clear. Howard Marks would worry about integration risk.
-3.51%
A negative yoy shift can boost short-term liquidity if no prime investments appear. Benjamin Graham would consider it wise if safer returns do not exist.
6.03%
Proceeds growth 5-10% yoy – Mild. Peter Lynch would consider the rationale behind these partial liquidations.
115.70%
Above 20% yoy – Large jump. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on whether these “other” items overshadow core expansions.
68.93%
Above 15% yoy – Heavy. Philip Fisher would require evidence these invests drive future returns and do not hamper free cash flow too much.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.59%
A negative yoy figure could mean fewer or no new shares or even net buybacks. Benjamin Graham would see it as positive unless expansions need capital that internal cash cannot provide.
3.08%
Buyback growth 0-5% yoy – Minimal. Howard Marks would question if more capital allocation is needed for expansions or deeper buybacks.