503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Gauges a company's financial stability and solvency. Value investors pay close attention to leverage and liquidity risk, ensuring the company has enough cushion to withstand downturns without impairing shareholder value.
0.22
D/E of 0.22 while PANW has all-equity financing. Bruce Berkowitz would demand higher returns to justify our leverage.
0.86
Net debt 1-2x EBITDA - Reasonable leverage that Peter Lynch might accept. Cross-check Current Ratio to verify short-term liquidity remains strong.
67.96
Positive coverage while PANW shows negative coverage. John Neff would examine our competitive advantages in a challenging market.
2.76
Current ratio of 2.76 while PANW has zero ratio. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if our working capital management provides advantages.
13.43%
Intangibles of 13.43% while PANW has none. Bruce Berkowitz would demand evidence of superior returns on intangible investments.
