503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Gauges a company's financial stability and solvency. Value investors pay close attention to leverage and liquidity risk, ensuring the company has enough cushion to withstand downturns without impairing shareholder value.
0.17
D/E of 0.17 while PANW has all-equity financing. Bruce Berkowitz would demand higher returns to justify our leverage.
1.09
Net debt less than half of PANW's 161.85. Charlie Munger would approve but verify if excess conservatism is warranted given competitive dynamics.
55.87
Positive coverage while PANW shows negative coverage. John Neff would examine our competitive advantages in a challenging market.
2.68
Similar current ratio to PANW's 2.77. Guy Spier would investigate if industry liquidity norms make sense for both companies.
14.68%
Intangibles of 14.68% while PANW has none. Bruce Berkowitz would demand evidence of superior returns on intangible investments.
