503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Gauges a company's financial stability and solvency. Value investors pay close attention to leverage and liquidity risk, ensuring the company has enough cushion to withstand downturns without impairing shareholder value.
0.21
D/E of 0.21 while PANW has all-equity financing. Bruce Berkowitz would demand higher returns to justify our leverage.
1.72
Net debt less than half of PANW's 73.75. Charlie Munger would approve but verify if excess conservatism is warranted given competitive dynamics.
50.61
Coverage of 50.61 while PANW has no interest expense. Bruce Berkowitz would demand higher returns to justify our leverage.
2.71
Similar current ratio to PANW's 2.57. Guy Spier would investigate if industry liquidity norms make sense for both companies.
12.45%
Dangerously higher intangibles above 1.5x PANW's 0.23%. Jim Chanos would check for potential write-down risks.
