503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Gauges a company's financial stability and solvency. Value investors pay close attention to leverage and liquidity risk, ensuring the company has enough cushion to withstand downturns without impairing shareholder value.
0.66
D/E of 0.66 while ZETA has all-equity financing. Bruce Berkowitz would demand higher returns to justify our leverage.
4.63
Net debt 1-2x EBITDA - Reasonable leverage that Peter Lynch might accept. Cross-check Current Ratio to verify short-term liquidity remains strong.
19.92
Positive coverage while ZETA shows negative coverage. John Neff would examine our competitive advantages in a challenging market.
2.85
Current ratio of 2.85 while ZETA has zero ratio. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if our working capital management provides advantages.
17.79%
Intangibles of 17.79% while ZETA has none. Bruce Berkowitz would demand evidence of superior returns on intangible investments.
