503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.11%
Revenue growth below 50% of AI's 10.06%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-1.94%
Cost reduction while AI shows 1.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
0.60%
Gross profit growth below 50% of AI's 15.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.49%
Margin expansion below 50% of AI's 5.12%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.07%
R&D growth while AI reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while AI shows 7.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while AI shows 15.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.99%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x AI's 7.22%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
10.95%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AI's 6.07%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
142.57%
D&A growth while AI reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.97%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
37.21%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x AI's 4.30%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-12.86%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.95%
Operating margin decline while AI shows 7.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-186.68%
Other expenses reduction while AI shows 21.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-44.29%
Pre-tax income decline while AI shows 0.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.35%
Pre-tax margin decline while AI shows 9.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.25%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-44.30%
Net income decline while AI shows 0.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.36%
Net margin decline while AI shows 9.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.00%
EPS decline while AI shows 3.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.00%
Diluted EPS decline while AI shows 3.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.01%
Share count reduction while AI shows 2.19% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.72%
Diluted share reduction while AI shows 2.19% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.