PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.29%
Similar revenue growth to AI's 10.06%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
5.03%
Cost growth above 1.5x AI's 1.92%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
9.04%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of AI's 15.70%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
0.69%
Margin expansion below 50% of AI's 5.12%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.09%
R&D growth while AI reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while AI shows 7.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while AI shows 15.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.23%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x AI's 7.22%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
12.99%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AI's 6.07%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.46%
D&A growth while AI reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.53%
EBITDA growth while AI declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.64%
EBITDA margin decline while AI shows 4.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.82%
Operating margin decline while AI shows 7.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.71%
Other expenses reduction while AI shows 21.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.32%
Pre-tax income decline while AI shows 0.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.88%
Pre-tax margin decline while AI shows 9.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.88%
Tax expense growth while AI reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.01%
Net income decline while AI shows 0.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.28%
Net margin decline while AI shows 9.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.45%
EPS decline while AI shows 3.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.45%
Diluted EPS decline while AI shows 3.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.11%
Share count reduction while AI shows 2.19% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.65%
Diluted share reduction while AI shows 2.19% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.