PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-17.67%
Revenue decline while AI shows 10.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-19.37%
Cost reduction while AI shows 1.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-17.12%
Gross profit decline while AI shows 15.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.66%
Margin expansion below 50% of AI's 5.12%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.84%
R&D growth while AI reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
22.75%
G&A growth above 1.5x AI's 7.95%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
-11.29%
Marketing expense reduction while AI shows 15.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.91%
Operating expenses reduction while AI shows 7.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.07%
Total costs reduction while AI shows 6.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
16.67%
Interest expense change of 16.67% while AI maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
8.60%
D&A growth while AI reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-38.16%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.80%
EBITDA margin decline while AI shows 4.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.08%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.08%
Operating margin decline while AI shows 7.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.82%
Other expenses reduction while AI shows 21.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-29.09%
Pre-tax income decline while AI shows 0.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.88%
Pre-tax margin decline while AI shows 9.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-57.43%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-21.13%
Net income decline while AI shows 0.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.21%
Net margin decline while AI shows 9.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.51%
EPS decline while AI shows 3.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.78%
Diluted EPS decline while AI shows 3.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.91%
Share count reduction while AI shows 2.19% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.70%
Diluted share reduction while AI shows 2.19% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.