PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.65%
Revenue decline while AI shows 10.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-29.90%
Cost reduction while AI shows 1.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-11.75%
Gross profit decline while AI shows 15.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.88%
Margin expansion 1.25-1.5x AI's 5.12%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
6.16%
R&D growth while AI reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
2.68%
G&A growth less than half of AI's 7.95%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
-9.25%
Marketing expense reduction while AI shows 15.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-140.00%
Other expenses reduction while AI shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-2.37%
Operating expenses reduction while AI shows 7.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.41%
Total costs reduction while AI shows 6.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.98%
D&A growth while AI reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-19.84%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.06%
EBITDA margin decline while AI shows 4.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.27%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.33%
Operating margin decline while AI shows 7.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-104.49%
Other expenses reduction while AI shows 21.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-22.77%
Pre-tax income decline while AI shows 0.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.34%
Pre-tax margin decline while AI shows 9.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.29%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-22.89%
Net income decline while AI shows 0.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.48%
Net margin decline while AI shows 9.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.78%
EPS decline while AI shows 3.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.08%
Diluted EPS decline while AI shows 3.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.01%
Share count reduction while AI shows 2.19% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.39%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x AI's 2.19%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.