PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.77%
Revenue decline while AI shows 10.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
8.93%
Cost growth above 1.5x AI's 1.92%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-5.44%
Gross profit decline while AI shows 15.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.70%
Margin decline while AI shows 5.12% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.86%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-16.17%
G&A reduction while AI shows 7.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-20.38%
Marketing expense reduction while AI shows 15.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
46.97%
Other expenses change of 46.97% while AI maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-13.45%
Operating expenses reduction while AI shows 7.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.31%
Total costs reduction while AI shows 6.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.73%
Interest expense reduction while AI shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.03%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-11.82%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.90%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of AI's 4.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.84%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.14%
Operating margin decline while AI shows 7.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-45.26%
Other expenses reduction while AI shows 21.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.35%
Pre-tax income decline while AI shows 0.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.65%
Pre-tax margin decline while AI shows 9.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.99%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.56%
Net income decline while AI shows 0.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.79%
Net margin decline while AI shows 9.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.79%
EPS decline while AI shows 3.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.82%
Diluted EPS decline while AI shows 3.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.04%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AI's 2.19%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.07%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x AI's 2.19%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.