PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.12%
Revenue decline while AI shows 10.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-3.49%
Cost reduction while AI shows 1.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-10.47%
Gross profit decline while AI shows 15.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.56%
Margin decline while AI shows 5.12% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.27%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-14.78%
G&A reduction while AI shows 7.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-15.85%
Marketing expense reduction while AI shows 15.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-2425.00%
Other expenses reduction while AI shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-11.38%
Operating expenses reduction while AI shows 7.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.65%
Total costs reduction while AI shows 6.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.81%
Interest expense change of 0.81% while AI maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-2.14%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
36306.25%
EBITDA growth while AI declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.12%
EBITDA margin decline while AI shows 4.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
382.17%
Operating income growth while AI declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
407.11%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x AI's 7.71%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-194.28%
Other expenses reduction while AI shows 21.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
413.95%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x AI's 0.34%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
441.70%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x AI's 9.46%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-57.54%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
253.43%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x AI's 0.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
266.99%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x AI's 9.71%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
252.50%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x AI's 3.23%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
252.50%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x AI's 3.23%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.81%
Share count reduction while AI shows 2.19% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.29%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x AI's 2.19%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.