PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-13.72%
Revenue decline while AI shows 10.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-21.78%
Cost reduction while AI shows 1.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-8.01%
Gross profit decline while AI shows 15.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
6.62%
Margin expansion 1.25-1.5x AI's 5.12%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
2.76%
R&D growth while AI reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
9.83%
G&A growth 1.1-1.25x AI's 7.95%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of necessary spending.
-13.99%
Marketing expense reduction while AI shows 15.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-250.00%
Other expenses reduction while AI shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.71%
Operating expenses reduction while AI shows 7.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.19%
Total costs reduction while AI shows 6.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.03%
Interest expense change of 10.03% while AI maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
10.56%
D&A growth while AI reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-12.33%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.47%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x AI's 4.30%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-12.33%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.61%
Operating margin growth below 50% of AI's 7.71%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-44.44%
Other expenses reduction while AI shows 21.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-13.99%
Pre-tax income decline while AI shows 0.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.31%
Pre-tax margin decline while AI shows 9.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
52.93%
Tax expense growth while AI reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-25.15%
Net income decline while AI shows 0.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.25%
Net margin decline while AI shows 9.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.81%
EPS decline while AI shows 3.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.19%
Diluted EPS decline while AI shows 3.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.87%
Share count reduction while AI shows 2.19% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.82%
Diluted share reduction while AI shows 2.19% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.