PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.78%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AI's 10.06%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
26.22%
Cost growth above 1.5x AI's 1.92%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
13.07%
Similar gross profit growth to AI's 15.70%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-3.99%
Margin decline while AI shows 5.12% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.42%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-15.89%
G&A reduction while AI shows 7.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
26.76%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x AI's 15.50%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-1046.67%
Other expenses reduction while AI shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
8.83%
Operating expenses growth 1.1-1.25x AI's 7.22%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
17.80%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AI's 6.07%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
19.22%
Interest expense change of 19.22% while AI maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
19.27%
D&A growth while AI reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.05%
EBITDA growth while AI declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.30%
EBITDA margin decline while AI shows 4.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
17.72%
Operating income growth while AI declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.05%
Operating margin decline while AI shows 7.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.46%
Other expenses growth less than half of AI's 21.42%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
17.50%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x AI's 0.34%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.23%
Pre-tax margin decline while AI shows 9.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
51.29%
Tax expense growth while AI reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
10.59%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x AI's 0.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-6.10%
Net margin decline while AI shows 9.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
10.96%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x AI's 3.23%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
11.11%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x AI's 3.23%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.44%
Share count reduction while AI shows 2.19% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.58%
Diluted share reduction while AI shows 2.19% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.