PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.45%
Revenue growth below 50% of AI's 10.06%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
4.91%
Cost growth above 1.5x AI's 1.92%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-1.92%
Gross profit decline while AI shows 15.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.36%
Margin decline while AI shows 5.12% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.74%
R&D growth while AI reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
12.73%
G&A growth above 1.5x AI's 7.95%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
12.50%
Similar marketing expense growth to AI's 15.50%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry requirements.
42.50%
Other expenses change of 42.50% while AI maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
9.44%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x AI's 7.22%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
7.23%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x AI's 6.07%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
7.55%
Interest expense change of 7.55% while AI maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-4.48%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-6.90%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.31%
EBITDA margin decline while AI shows 4.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.72%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.08%
Operating margin decline while AI shows 7.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-370.89%
Other expenses reduction while AI shows 21.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-21.84%
Pre-tax income decline while AI shows 0.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.19%
Pre-tax margin decline while AI shows 9.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-160.20%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
18.72%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x AI's 0.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
18.19%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x AI's 9.71%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
18.31%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x AI's 3.23%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
18.57%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x AI's 3.23%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.13%
Share count reduction while AI shows 2.19% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.09%
Diluted share reduction while AI shows 2.19% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.