PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.24%
Positive growth while AI shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
13.18%
Similar cost growth to AI's 12.75%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
1.70%
Positive growth while AI shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.26%
R&D growth while AI reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
67.17%
G&A growth while AI reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
10.79%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x AI's 4.53%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-22.58%
Other expenses reduction while AI shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
12.99%
Operating expenses growth while AI reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.09%
Total costs growth while AI reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.00%
Interest expense reduction while AI shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
30.75%
D&A growth while AI reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.45%
EBITDA decline while AI shows 1.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.20%
Operating income decline while AI shows 1.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.92%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-211.11%
Other expenses reduction while AI shows 116.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.72%
Pre-tax income decline while AI shows 4.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.54%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-6.44%
Net income decline while AI shows 4.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.38%
EPS decline while AI shows 5.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.38%
Diluted EPS decline while AI shows 5.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.08%
Share count reduction while AI shows 1.90% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.16%
Diluted share reduction while AI shows 1.90% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.