PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.26%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x BB's 2.45%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
59.00%
Cost increase while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
0.03%
Gross profit growth below 50% of BB's 7.80%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.28%
Margin decline while BB shows 5.22% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.19%
R&D growth less than half of BB's 10.17%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
133.33%
G&A change of 133.33% while BB maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
39.59%
Marketing expense change of 39.59% while BB maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.62%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x BB's 13.84%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
33.70%
Total costs growth above 1.5x BB's 6.73%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.73%
D&A growth while BB reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-24.02%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-40.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.25%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
33.90%
Other expenses growth while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-14.80%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.73%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.34%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-8.62%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.53%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.53%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.34%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.80%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.