PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.92%
Revenue decline while BB shows 14.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-9.42%
Cost reduction while BB shows 11.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.56%
Gross profit decline while BB shows 16.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.38%
Margin expansion below 50% of BB's 1.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.63%
R&D growth less than half of BB's 10.08%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
52.04%
G&A change of 52.04% while BB maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-12.16%
Marketing expense reduction while BB shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.87%
Operating expenses growth less than half of BB's 28.10%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.34%
Total costs reduction while BB shows 17.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.38%
D&A reduction while BB shows 1.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-16.51%
EBITDA decline while BB shows 4.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.40%
EBITDA margin decline while BB shows 2.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.51%
Operating income decline while BB shows 4.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.04%
Other expenses reduction while BB shows 11.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.00%
Pre-tax income decline while BB shows 5.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.84%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-18.51%
Net income decline while BB shows 7.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.14%
EPS decline while BB shows 10.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.71%
Diluted EPS decline while BB shows 5.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.43%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-2.10%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.