PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.29%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x BB's 0.58%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
5.03%
Cost growth above 1.5x BB's 2.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
9.04%
Positive growth while BB shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.69%
Margin expansion while BB shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
15.09%
R&D growth above 1.5x BB's 5.98%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while BB shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while BB shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.23%
Operating expenses growth less than half of BB's 91.43%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
12.99%
Total costs growth less than half of BB's 37.90%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.46%
D&A growth above 1.5x BB's 18.47%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
6.53%
EBITDA growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.71%
Other expenses reduction while BB shows 10.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.32%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.88%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.88%
Tax expense growth while BB reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.01%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.45%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.45%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.11%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.65%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.