PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.41%
Revenue growth 50-75% of BB's 14.87%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
37.18%
Cost growth above 1.5x BB's 14.89%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
4.17%
Gross profit growth below 50% of BB's 14.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.31%
R&D growth less than half of BB's 41.85%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-6.31%
G&A reduction while BB shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
20.30%
Marketing expense change of 20.30% while BB maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.16%
Operating expenses growth less than half of BB's 42.97%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
17.97%
Similar total costs growth to BB's 23.53%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.03%
D&A growth less than half of BB's 22.18%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-1.00%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3662.50%
Other expenses reduction while BB shows 504.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.89%
Pre-tax income decline while BB shows 8.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.52%
Tax expense reduction while BB shows 22.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.55%
Net income decline while BB shows 2.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.08%
EPS decline while BB shows 2.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.08%
Diluted EPS decline while BB shows 2.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.99%
Share count reduction while BB shows 0.24% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.93%
Diluted share reduction while BB shows 0.03% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.