PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.02%
Revenue decline while BB shows 24.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.10%
Cost reduction while BB shows 37.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.96%
Gross profit decline while BB shows 8.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.10%
Margin expansion while BB shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.59%
R&D growth while BB reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
16.29%
G&A change of 16.29% while BB maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
7.08%
Marketing expense change of 7.08% while BB maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while BB shows 16.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.03%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of BB's 3.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-1.06%
Total costs reduction while BB shows 27.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.56%
D&A growth less than half of BB's 35.38%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
5.18%
EBITDA growth below 50% of BB's 16.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-13.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.16%
Operating income decline while BB shows 14.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.40%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
139.95%
Other expenses growth while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.27%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of BB's 10.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.56%
Pre-tax margin growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.24%
Tax expense growth while BB reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.28%
Net income growth below 50% of BB's 30.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.57%
Net margin growth 1.25-1.5x BB's 5.06%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
3.03%
EPS growth below 50% of BB's 30.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.03%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of BB's 30.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.10%
Share count reduction below 50% of BB's 0.19%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.63%
Diluted share increase while BB reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.