PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
47.23%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x BB's 2.98%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
27.66%
Cost growth above 1.5x BB's 2.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
52.75%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x BB's 4.22%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3.75%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x BB's 1.19%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.68%
R&D growth less than half of BB's 7.19%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
59.65%
G&A change of 59.65% while BB maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
29.71%
Marketing expense change of 29.71% while BB maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.96%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x BB's 12.60%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
24.54%
Total costs growth above 1.5x BB's 5.13%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.80%
D&A reduction while BB shows 9.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
75.00%
EBITDA growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.81%
EBITDA margin growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
89.94%
Operating income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
29.01%
Operating margin growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.74%
Other expenses growth while BB reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
86.42%
Pre-tax income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
26.62%
Pre-tax margin growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
86.48%
Tax expense growth less than half of BB's 227.57%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
86.40%
Net income growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
26.61%
Net margin growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
87.50%
EPS growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
85.00%
Diluted EPS growth while BB declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.65%
Share count reduction while BB shows 0.18% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.36%
Diluted share reduction while BB shows 0.05% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.